Triple agonist sounds scary - is it actually safe — looking for input

GenomicsKate said:

Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent…

GenomicsKate has the substance of this right. The condition it depends on is worth stating. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.

MikeNYC_runner said:

The glucagon component looks paradoxical and is not.

This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.

GenomicsKate said:

Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent…

I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.

Happy to go further on any of that.

Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Carry on.