🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCrypto & PrivacyPharmacy only accepts Bitcoin and I have no idea what I am doing — 6 month update

Pharmacy only accepts Bitcoin and I have no idea what I am doing — 6 month update

ben_calgary Sat, Mar 28, 2026 at 9:32 AM 27 replies 809 viewsPage 1 of 6
ben_calgary
Member
245
1,123
Oct 2024
Calgary, CA
Mar 28, 2026 at 9:32 AM#1

Posting this because the summary going around does not say what the paper says, and the difference matters for how people here are using it.

The trade-off is reversibility against privacy and there is no option that gives you both. Card payments are reversible and disclose the most; crypto discloses least and is irreversible, which is precisely why pressure toward it is a warning sign when it comes from a seller rather than a buyer. Escrow only means anything where the escrow agent is independent of both parties, which is rarely the case in practice.

Where I think it is weakest: the population was selected and supported in ways a real cohort is not, so I would read the effect size as a ceiling rather than an expectation.

What would genuinely help is knowing how people are thinking about the trade-off between reversibility and privacy, because you cannot have both. I would rather have one careful answer than five confident ones.

Note on sourcing:
Figures above are from the primary publication rather than the press summary. If a number here disagrees with one you have, post yours and we will work out which of us is reading a secondary source.
26 21KetoKyle, CanadaChris, ZaraB_AL and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
amsterdam_pete
Senior Member
1,567
6,789
Feb 2024
Netherlands
Mar 28, 2026 at 9:42 AM#2
ben_calgary said:
The trade-off is reversibility against privacy and there is no option that gives you both.

Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.

25 20ZaraB_AL, JakeSmashed95, NauseaFreeNow and 22 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
COA_Karl
Senior Member
2,123
8,901
Jan 2024
Pennsylvania
Mar 28, 2026 at 9:52 AM#3
ben_calgary said:
The trade-off is reversibility against privacy and there is no option that gives you both.

Pushing back on ben_calgary here. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.

24 19hyun_seoul, jim_asheville, matt_MKE and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
chris_chi24
Member
389
1,678
Sep 2024
Chicago, IL
Mar 28, 2026 at 10:02 AM#4

Short answer first, then the reasoning. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.

23 18PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DadBodDave
Member
187
923
Nov 2024
Ohio
Mar 28, 2026 at 10:56 AM#5
amsterdam_pete said:
Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible.

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.

22 17JakeBK_lifts, DerekSJ_a1c, paige_pharma and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1236

Similar Threads

Monero vs Lightning Network for pharmacy payments — privacy comparison18 replies
Bitcoin payment guide for peptide purchases9 replies
Cryptocurrency payment adoption by compounding pharmacies — 20267 replies
Privacy coins and HIPAA — does crypto payment enhance medical privacy?8 replies
Escrow services for international peptide orders6 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register