Dr.EndoIndy said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
Dr.EndoIndy said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
laura_annarbor said:The phase 2 numbers were about 24% mean weight loss at 48 weeks on the top dose, with the curve still descending at the end of the study.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Dr.EndoIndy said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemOne concrete data point for the thread. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful.