From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
VanRx_Mike said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Same pattern here, and in the same order.
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsVanRx_Mike said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Coming at VanRx_Mike’s question from a different direction. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. No action needed from anybody.