🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesGLP-1 and atrial fibrillation risk — my results so far

GLP-1 and atrial fibrillation risk — my results so far

sarah_nash92 Thu, May 2, 2024 at 8:35 PM 8 replies 1,978 viewsPage 1 of 2
This thread is more than 25 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
sarah_nash92
Member
712
3,123
Jun 2024
Nashville, TN
May 2, 2024 at 8:35 PM#1

My reason for being on this is cardiovascular rather than cosmetic, which puts me in a small minority in most of these threads.

So the question, as narrowly as I can put it: how much of the SELECT benefit is plausibly independent of the weight loss, and whether that distinction changes anything practical.

Not looking for reassurance. Looking for the part I have got wrong.

41 11NauseaFreeNow, SteveThurs, B12Beth and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.ObesityMed
VIP Member
3,456
19,234
Nov 2023
Denver, CO
Online
May 2, 2024 at 8:48 PM#2
sarah_nash92 said:
My reason for being on this is cardiovascular rather than cosmetic, which puts me in a small minority in most of these threads.

Lp(a) and cardiovascular risk: a nuance that matters. Unlike most lipid markers, Lp(a) is 90%+ genetically determined and doesn't really change with weight loss or GLP-1 therapy.

My Lp(a) has remained at 54 nmol/L across all time points. If yours is elevated (>50 nmol/L), you need additional risk mitigation strategies regardless of your GLP-1 response. Don't assume your medication is covering all cardiovascular risk factors.

Last edited: May 3, 2024 at 2:48 AM
40 10PharmacoVig_BOS, SurmountFan_IN, PeptideChemSF and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
hyun_seoul
Member
345
1,456
Jul 2024
Seoul, KR
May 2, 2024 at 9:01 PM#3
Dr.ObesityMed said:
Lp(a) and cardiovascular risk: a nuance that matters.

I want to bring up the cardiovascular angle on cardiovascular risk.

The SELECT trial demonstrated a 20% reduction in MACE with semaglutide 2.4mg[1]. This is practice-changing because the CV benefit appears to be independent of the degree of weight loss — suggesting direct vascular and anti-inflammatory mechanisms.

For cardiovascular risk, this means we need to think beyond the primary outcome and consider the cardiovascular implications. The all-cause mortality reduction (HR 0.81) is the most clinically meaningful signal.

References:
[1] Lincoff AM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(24):2221-2232.
Last edited: May 3, 2024 at 1:01 AM
39 9MASHdoc_SA, GenomicsKate, Dr.ObesityMed and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
BiostatsBrad
Member
456
2,345
Jul 2024
Durham, NC
May 2, 2024 at 9:14 PM#4
sarah_nash92 said:
My reason for being on this is cardiovascular rather than cosmetic, which puts me in a small minority in most of these threads.

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.

38 8james_edin, FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LibrarianMeg
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Mar 2024
Baltimore, MD
May 2, 2024 at 10:23 PM#5

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

Continuous metabolic monitoring dashboard for cardiovascular risk — I track everything in a spreadsheet and here's the month-over-month trend for my key markers:

Weight: consistent downtrend, -1.9 lbs/week average
Fasting glucose (finger stick): stable at 88 mg/dL
Blood pressure (home): 119/74 average
Resting heart rate: 68 bpm (down from 84)
Waist circumference: down 18 inches total

The resting heart rate improvement correlates with cardiovascular fitness gains. Everything is moving in the right direction.

37 7TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92 and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register