🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesHeart rate increase on GLP-1 — November 2025 Page 7

Heart rate increase on GLP-1 — November 2025

Dr.ObesityMed Thu, May 30, 2024 at 5:58 AM 31 replies 2,498 viewsPage 7 of 7
pete_manc_UK
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
Mar 2024
Manchester, UK
Jun 9, 2024 at 2:16 PM#31
VanRx_Mike said:
Continuous metabolic monitoring dashboard for cardiovascular risk — I track everything in a spreadsheet and here's the month-over-month trend for my…

Coming at VanRx_Mike’s question from a different direction. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.

30 3TrialNerd_Beth, HPLC_Greg, LibrarianMeg and 27 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LabKate
Senior Member
2,678
11,234
Jan 2024
Oregon
Jun 10, 2024 at 8:24 AM#32

One concrete data point for the thread. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.

Happy to go further on any of that.

31 4laura_annarbor, JenMemphis, pat_auckland and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
rick_sfbay
Member
289
1,234
Jan 2025
San Francisco, CA
Jun 11, 2024 at 2:32 AM#33

Following on from VanRx_Mike — and this may be the naive question:

How long did you give it before you decided it was working?

32 5james_edin, FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
denise_HTX
Member
145
678
Jan 2025
Houston, TX
Jun 11, 2024 at 8:39 PM#34
LabKate said:
For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.

Last edited: Jun 11, 2024 at 10:39 PM
33 6KevinCompounds, TirzTom, TrialTracker_MD and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SleepDoc_PDX
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Portland, OR
Jun 12, 2024 at 2:46 PM#35
LabKate said:
For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.

Last edited: Jun 12, 2024 at 5:46 PM
34 7mel_PDX, Dr.AddMedPHL, newstart_MO and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1567

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register