james_edin said:Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
james_edin said:Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemFollowing on from james_edin — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
PeptideSynthNJ said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.