🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsVerified Vendors⭐ What "Verified" means — our testing and vetting process Page 17

⭐ What "Verified" means — our testing and vetting process

mike_mod Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 5:20 PM 516 replies 56,962 viewsPage 17 of 20
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Jul 12, 2024 at 7:52 PM#81

Closing the loop on my own question.

Closing this out. What actually changed my mind was the point about waiting for a trend instead of reading a single measurement, which is embarrassing in hindsight and worth saying anyway.

23 21PharmHunterJen, TomTeleRx, DoseLogDan and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
FitDadDave
Member
534
2,678
Jul 2024
Minneapolis, MN
Jul 15, 2024 at 12:18 AM#82
mike_mod said:
What actually changed my mind was the point about waiting for a trend instead of reading a single measurement, which is embarrassing in hindsight and…

Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.

24 22kim_atl_prep, sarah_TO, wendy_avl and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
nancy_portland
Member
345
1,567
Aug 2024
Portland, ME
Jul 17, 2024 at 4:42 AM#83
mike_mod said:
What actually changed my mind was the point about waiting for a trend instead of reading a single measurement, which is embarrassing in hindsight and…

That is correct as far as it goes, and here is where it stops going. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.

Last edited: Jul 17, 2024 at 5:42 AM
25 23MarkLI_maint, Dr.PeteFamMed, claudia_zurich and 22 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
SleepFixSam
Member
212
678
Nov 2024
Hawaii
Jul 19, 2024 at 9:05 AM#84
mike_mod said:
What actually changed my mind was the point about waiting for a trend instead of reading a single measurement, which is embarrassing in hindsight and…

This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else.

26 24denise_HTX, raj_cambridge, ingrid_STO and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
hyun_seoul
Member
345
1,456
Jul 2024
Seoul, KR
Jul 21, 2024 at 1:27 PM#85

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.

Last edited: Jul 21, 2024 at 5:27 PM
27 0LipidDoc_ATL, BariatricNurseD, MASHdoc_SA and 24 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

WWB June 2026 batch — Janoshik results 99.1% semaglutide3 replies
GGPeps (GYC) tirzepatide — PeptideMeter grade A, 98.7% purity9 replies
QSC semaglutide US warehouse — 4 day delivery, 98.4% HPLC9 replies
WWB vs QSC vs GGPeps — which should I go with?18 replies
My first order from WWB — nervous but it arrived perfectly8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register