One concrete data point for the thread. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
One thing that is still open after ingrid_STO’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
Dr.RaviCardio said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Pushing back on Dr.RaviCardio here. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDr.RaviCardio said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes. The middle of the range is well understood; the ends are where the honest answer is that nobody knows.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.
Dr.RaviCardio said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.