NurseAsh_DET said:Follow-up: I read the paper rather than the summary and the qualifier I was missing was in the second paragraph of the results.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
NurseAsh_DET said:Follow-up: I read the paper rather than the summary and the qualifier I was missing was in the second paragraph of the results.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsNurseAsh_DET said:Follow-up: I read the paper rather than the summary and the qualifier I was missing was in the second paragraph of the results.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.