🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsClinical Trials & ResearchSTEP-HFpEF-DM: semaglutide in HFpEF with diabetes — what worked for you? Page 3

STEP-HFpEF-DM: semaglutide in HFpEF with diabetes — what worked for you?

B12Beth Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 4:40 PM 11 replies 965 viewsPage 3 of 3
MikeFit_NJ
Senior Member
1,567
6,543
Apr 2024
New Jersey
Jan 22, 2026 at 1:48 PM#11
roxy_nash said:
SELECT is the trial that changed the framing of this class, because it was an outcome trial rather than a weight trial: about a 20% relative reduction…

That holds for the injectable. The oral formulation has different absorption behaviour and the dose numbers are not interchangeable, which is worth saying out loud because people quote them as if they were.

Last edited: Jan 22, 2026 at 4:48 PM
42 15LeilaHI, marcus_mpls, DeniseRN_TPA and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
chris_chi24
Member
389
1,678
Sep 2024
Chicago, IL
Jan 24, 2026 at 7:54 AM#12
Dr.NutriCornell said:
The dose-response is real but shallow at the top.

This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Taking it to my next appointment.

Last edited: Jan 24, 2026 at 10:54 AM
43 16MounjBrad, nick_newbie, DadBodDave and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
KevinCompounds
VIP Member
5,432
18,234
Dec 2023
Nevada
Jan 26, 2026 at 1:59 AM#13
roxy_nash said:
SELECT is the trial that changed the framing of this class, because it was an outcome trial rather than a weight trial: about a 20% relative reduction…

Pushing back on roxy_nash here. The trial means are being read too generously in this thread. STEP populations were selected, supported, and titrated by protocol, and the real-world curves are consistently a few points worse. That difference is not noise, it is what happens when you remove the study infrastructure.

44 17MikeKY_noInsulin, Dr.RaviCardio, jennifer_SEA and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
DanielChem_CHI
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
Mar 2024
Chicago, IL
Jan 27, 2026 at 8:03 PM#14

One concrete data point for the thread. Relative versus absolute is the distinction that gets lost: a 20% relative reduction on a high baseline risk is a large absolute benefit, and the same relative figure on a low baseline risk is a small one.

Last edited: Jan 27, 2026 at 10:03 PM
45 18ben_calgary, patPC_UT, Dr.DermMIA and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Jan 29, 2026 at 2:06 PM#15

Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out.

46 19PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

FLOW trial: semaglutide renal outcomes — NEJM publication review14 replies
SELECT trial: semaglutide 2.4mg cardiovascular outcomes — 4yr data9 replies
TRIUMPH program (retatrutide) — Phase 3 trial design and endpoints13 replies
Orforglipron ATTAIN trials — oral non-peptide GLP-1 agonist8 replies
CagriSema (amylin + semaglutide) — REDEFINE Phase 3 results20 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register