Dr.AddMedPHL said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Same pattern here, and in the same order.
Dr.AddMedPHL said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Coming at Dr.AddMedPHL’s question from a different direction. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.
One concrete data point for the thread. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
Dr.NateNeph said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Pushing back on Dr.NateNeph here. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.