OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
quinn_sf said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultsingrid_STO said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.
ingrid_STO said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
Coming at ingrid_STO’s question from a different direction. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.