CarlaRPh_TPA said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
Dr.RaviCardio said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after Dr.RaviCardio’s answer:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?