🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesSELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — looking for input Page 3

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — looking for input

TinaHashiRN Sun, Jan 4, 2026 at 9:06 AM 29 replies 1,384 viewsPage 3 of 6
tane_welly
Member
234
1,123
Sep 2024
Wellington, NZ
Jan 4, 2026 at 8:21 PM#11
Dr.PathRoch said:
Read four things before the headline number.

This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.

Last edited: Jan 4, 2026 at 11:21 PM
18 18GraceAZ_72, carl_compliance, DanielChem_CHI and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
james_edin
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Edinburgh, UK
Jan 4, 2026 at 10:25 PM#12

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads.

Dizziness and cardiovascular risk: I was lightheaded for the first 2 weeks. Root cause was a combination of reduced caloric intake and mild dehydration.

Fix: minimum 80-100oz water daily, don't skip meals even if you're not hungry (eat small protein-rich snacks), and stand up slowly from sitting/lying positions. Also check your blood pressure — GLP-1-induced weight loss can make BP meds too strong, requiring dose reduction.

17 17Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX, andrew_nyc and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
COA_Karl
Senior Member
2,123
8,901
Jan 2024
Pennsylvania
Jan 5, 2026 at 12:29 AM#13
lisa_labSD said:
Relative and absolute effects need reading together.

Pushing back on lisa_labSD here. I would add the less popular caveat: these trial populations under-represented several groups, older adults and the highest BMI categories among them. The results probably generalise, and "probably" should be stated as an assumption rather than dropped.

16 16hyun_seoul, jim_asheville, matt_MKE and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
bri_stats
Member
789
3,456
May 2024
Seattle, WA
Jan 5, 2026 at 2:33 AM#14
TinaHashiRN said:
SELECT is the trial that changed the framing of this class, because it was an outcome trial rather than a weight trial: about a 20% relative reduction…
TinaHashiRN said:
...we're creating a generation dependent on cardiovascular risk...

I understand the concern, but consider this analogy: are we "creating a generation dependent on" blood pressure medication? Cholesterol medication? Thyroid medication?

Obesity is a chronic disease with biological drivers. Treating it with medication is no different from treating any other chronic condition. The "dependency" framing implies weakness or moral failure — neither of which is accurate.

If ongoing medication is what keeps someone healthy, that's successful treatment, not dependency.

Last edited: Jan 5, 2026 at 6:33 AM
15 15JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Jan 5, 2026 at 4:37 AM#15

Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here.

14 14PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register