🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsPublic SquareLoose skin after major weight loss — my results so far Page 5

Loose skin after major weight loss — my results so far

BethLabQueen Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 2:13 PM 43 replies 2,238 viewsPage 5 of 9
KarenAZ_mom
Member
567
2,567
Aug 2024
Scottsdale, AZ
Dec 30, 2024 at 1:40 AM#21
DoseLogDan said:
Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…

Pushing back on DoseLogDan here. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.

8 8anna.melb_AU, mark_tokyo, hans_munich and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SandraNC_45
Member
312
1,345
Sep 2024
Charlotte, NC
Jan 3, 2025 at 2:52 PM#22
DoseLogDan said:
Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…

Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

7 7james_edin, FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
JakeSmashed95
Member
412
1,890
Aug 2024
Arkansas
Online
Jan 8, 2025 at 4:07 AM#23
DoseLogDan said:
Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…

Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Taking it to my next appointment.

6 6alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa, Dr.PainCLE and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
sophie_paris
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Paris, FR
Jan 12, 2025 at 5:25 PM#24

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.

5 5AussieAnna, BethLabQueen, ChrisMacros and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.PainCLE
Senior Member
1,234
6,234
Mar 2024
Cleveland, OH
Jan 17, 2025 at 6:45 AM#25
sophie_paris said:
The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.

Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.

4 4amy_econ_NJ, bbq_ray_KC, oliver_london and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1345679

Similar Threads

SELECT trial 4-year follow-up data released — sustained MACE reduction16 replies
GLP-1 receptor agonists and thyroid C-cell concerns — evidence review19 replies
Is there a ceiling effect for GLP-1-mediated weight loss?20 replies
Comparative pharmacokinetics: semaglutide vs tirzepatide vs retatrutide6 replies
My 18-month semaglutide journey — comprehensive data log20 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register