hank_denver said:Update: approved on the third attempt after a peer-to-peer.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use.
hank_denver said:Update: approved on the third attempt after a peer-to-peer.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
One concrete data point for the thread. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFollowing on from hank_denver — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
kate.chem said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.