MikeFit_NJ said:That holds where the measurement is reliable.
Mine went the same way, slower. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
MikeFit_NJ said:That holds where the measurement is reliable.
Coming at MikeFit_NJ’s question from a different direction. SURMOUNT-1 landed around 20.9% mean weight loss at 15mg over 72 weeks, against roughly 15% for semaglutide 2.4mg in STEP 1. Different trials, different populations, so the comparison is indicative rather than decisive — but SURPASS-2 was a genuine head-to-head and it pointed the same way.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne thing that is still open after MikeFit_NJ’s answer:
Whether anyone has held 10mg long term rather than climbing, and what happened over the following year?
LabKate said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.