Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
One thing that is still open after roxy_nash’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
lucas_SP_BR said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
I read this differently from lucas_SP_BR, on substance rather than tone. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultslucas_SP_BR said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.
lucas_SP_BR said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.