One thing that is still open after rachel_ABQ’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
One thing that is still open after rachel_ABQ’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
Dr.SurgeonPGH said:Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.
Pushing back on Dr.SurgeonPGH here. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.
Dr.SurgeonPGH said:Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.SurgeonPGH said:Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.