Following on from Dr.PeteFamMed — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
Following on from Dr.PeteFamMed — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
josh_phd_bmore said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
Pushing back on josh_phd_bmore here. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
josh_phd_bmore said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL Biochemjosh_phd_bmore said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.