Tirz made me a completely different person holy cow

pat_auckland said:

It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.

Correct as far as it goes. The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.

MASHdoc_SA said:

True, though the ladder is longer and that is not a neutral detail — six dose steps means six opportunities to stall on the way up, and plenty of…

This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Taking it to my next appointment.

pat_auckland said:

It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful.