Dr.RaviCardio said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. Nothing to add that would improve it.
Dr.RaviCardio said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Coming at Dr.RaviCardio’s question from a different direction. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne thing that is still open after Dr.RaviCardio’s answer:
How much of the between-person variation is pharmacokinetic and how much is just adherence measured badly?
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
Following this thread I went back and re-read the extension data properly. The point about trough rather than peak explains the pattern I was seeing on day six, which I had been blaming on the vial.