Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
TinaHashiRN said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Posting only so the count is not one.
TinaHashiRN said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Coming at TinaHashiRN’s question from a different direction. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Following on from TinaHashiRN — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?