🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsInternationalHas anyone dealt with france ansm? Page 6

Has anyone dealt with france ansm?

mia_MS2 Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 6:21 PM 27 replies 1,773 viewsPage 6 of 6
kevin_tulsa
Member
489
2,123
Jun 2024
Tulsa, OK
Jul 9, 2025 at 4:36 PM#26
PedsEndoPhilly said:
The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.

Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. Nothing to add that would improve it.

Last edited: Jul 9, 2025 at 6:36 PM
12 12fiona_glasgow, Dr.RheumBOS, greg_boulder and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
dave_SLC
Member
345
1,567
Aug 2024
Salt Lake City, UT
Jul 10, 2025 at 11:09 AM#27
PedsEndoPhilly said:
The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.

Happy to go further on any of that.

Last edited: Jul 10, 2025 at 3:09 PM
11 11NicoleRaleigh, james_edin, FranDenver and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
bri_stats
Member
789
3,456
May 2024
Seattle, WA
Jul 11, 2025 at 5:42 AM#28

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.

Last edited: Jul 11, 2025 at 9:42 AM
10 10TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92 and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
Dr.ObesityLA
VIP Member
3,567
19,876
Dec 2023
Los Angeles, CA
Jul 12, 2025 at 12:14 AM#29

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?

9 9chris_chi24, tampaLisa73, KarenAZ_mom and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mia_MS2
New Member
8
23
Jun 2026
Ann Arbor, MI
Jul 12, 2025 at 6:46 PM#30

Closing the loop on my own question.

Late follow-up. I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.

37 12VanRx_Mike, steve_okc, dave_SLC and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1456

Similar Threads

EU EMA compounding guidance — 2026 regulatory update9 replies
UK NHS GLP-1 prescribing — NICE TA875 and access guide7 replies
Australian TGA scheduling changes — peptide access 20268 replies
Canadian GLP-1 coverage — provincial formulary comparison6 replies
Purchasing GLP-1 in Mexico — legality, quality, and safety concerns6 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register