🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesArterial stiffness reduction on GLP-1 — pulse wave velocity studies Page 3

Arterial stiffness reduction on GLP-1 — pulse wave velocity studies

Dr.RaviCardio Thu, May 21, 2026 at 5:24 AM 13 replies 517 viewsPage 3 of 3
jim_asheville
Member
289
1,234
Aug 2024
Asheville, NC
May 24, 2026 at 7:47 AM#11
Dr.MetabolicMD said:
I'm 58 years old and want to share my perspective on cardiovascular risk as an older member of this community.

This answered a question I did not know how to ask. I will report back once I have actually tried it.

40 15MikeKY_noInsulin, Dr.RaviCardio, jennifer_SEA and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NutriCornell
Senior Member
1,345
6,234
Mar 2024
Ithaca, NY
May 24, 2026 at 10:45 AM#12

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

Lp(a) and cardiovascular risk: a nuance that matters. Unlike most lipid markers, Lp(a) is 90%+ genetically determined and doesn't really change with weight loss or GLP-1 therapy.

My Lp(a) has remained at 43 nmol/L across all time points. If yours is elevated (>50 nmol/L), you need additional risk mitigation strategies regardless of your GLP-1 response. Don't assume your medication is covering all cardiovascular risk factors.

39 14Dr.SleepRoch, laura_annarbor, JenMemphis and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NateNeph
VIP Member
2,987
16,234
Dec 2023
Houston, TX
May 24, 2026 at 1:43 PM#13
Dr.AddMedPHL said:
Positive "side effect" of cardiovascular risk: my blood pressure dropped so much that I'm now off metoprolol entirely!
Dr.AddMedPHL said:
...we don't know the long-term effects of cardiovascular risk...

This is a fair point, and I think intellectual honesty requires acknowledging it. GLP-1 agonists in their current form have ~8-10 years of human exposure data. That's not nothing, but it's not 30+ years either.

However: the risk-benefit calculation should also consider the KNOWN long-term effects of untreated obesity — diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, joint destruction, reduced lifespan by 5-10 years.

Uncertainty about GLP-1 long-term safety vs certainty about obesity consequences. The calculus seems clear to me, but reasonable people can disagree.

Last edited: May 24, 2026 at 3:43 PM
38 13SteveThurs, B12Beth, RickReta_CO and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
anders_CPH
Senior Member
1,567
7,234
Feb 2024
Copenhagen, DK
May 24, 2026 at 4:41 PM#14
Dr.RaviCardio said:
SELECT is the trial that changed the framing of this class, because it was an outcome trial rather than a weight trial: about a 20% relative reduction…

6 month update on cardiovascular risk: down 53 lbs, off blood pressure meds, A1C normalized. Genuinely life-changing.

37 12BethLabQueen, ChrisMacros, KetoKyle and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
May 24, 2026 at 7:39 PM#15

Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. No action needed from anybody.

Last edited: May 24, 2026 at 9:39 PM
36 11PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register