🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesCoronary artery calcium score changes on GLP-1 — 2-year follow-up

Coronary artery calcium score changes on GLP-1 — 2-year follow-up

Dr.RaviCardio Thu, May 28, 2026 at 5:26 PM 14 replies 356 viewsPage 1 of 3
Dr.RaviCardio
VIP Member
2,890
15,678
Jan 2024
New York, NY
May 28, 2026 at 5:26 PM#1

This gets cited here weekly, usually second-hand, so it is worth setting out what it does and does not establish.

SELECT is the trial that changed the framing of this class, because it was an outcome trial rather than a weight trial: about a 20% relative reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events in people with established cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity, without diabetes. The effect appeared earlier than the weight-loss curve can comfortably explain, which is the basis for arguing that some of the benefit is direct — anti-inflammatory and vascular — rather than purely a consequence of weight.

Where I think it is weakest: the follow-up is short relative to how long people actually take these drugs, so durability is an assumption here rather than a finding.

The question I want answered is how much of the SELECT benefit is plausibly independent of the weight loss, and whether that distinction changes anything practical. I would rather have one careful answer than five confident ones.

Note on sourcing:
Figures above are from the primary publication rather than the press summary. If a number here disagrees with one you have, post yours and we will work out which of us is reading a secondary source.
39 9pete_manc_UK, anna.melb_AU, mark_tokyo and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
BethLabQueen
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
May 2024
Virginia
Online
May 28, 2026 at 5:34 PM#2
Dr.RaviCardio said:
SELECT is the trial that changed the framing of this class, because it was an outcome trial rather than a weight trial: about a 20% relative reduction…

Positive "side effect" of cardiovascular risk: my blood pressure dropped so much that I'm now off losartan entirely! My cardiologist is thrilled.

If you're on BP meds and losing weight on a GLP-1, monitor your BP at home regularly. Hypotension symptoms (dizziness, lightheadedness when standing) mean your BP meds may need reduction. Don't wait for your next scheduled appointment — call your doctor.

38 8Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona, stefan_berlin and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DataDave
Senior Member
1,678
8,901
Apr 2024
Washington
Online
May 28, 2026 at 5:42 PM#3
Dr.RaviCardio said:
SELECT is the trial that changed the framing of this class, because it was an outcome trial rather than a weight trial: about a 20% relative reduction…

I read this differently from Dr.RaviCardio, on substance rather than tone. The "earlier than weight loss explains" argument is weaker than this thread makes it sound. Blood pressure and inflammatory markers move fast and are downstream of early weight loss, so the mechanism is not as cleanly separable as the summaries imply.

37 7LondonLisa, mike_nyc, VendorMark and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
chris_chi24
Member
389
1,678
Sep 2024
Chicago, IL
May 28, 2026 at 5:50 PM#4
DataDave said:
The "earlier than weight loss explains" argument is weaker than this thread makes it sound.

SUSTAIN-6 was the first CVOT to show cardiovascular benefit with semaglutide, relevant to cardiovascular risk. In 3,297 T2DM patients with high CV risk: MACE HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.58-0.95, p=0.02)[1].

Notable: the retinopathy signal in SUSTAIN-6 (HR 1.76) was subsequently attributed to rapid A1C reduction in patients with pre-existing retinopathy — not a direct drug effect. This has been confirmed in longer-term follow-up studies.

References:
[1] Marso SP, et al. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1834-1844.
Last edited: May 28, 2026 at 8:50 PM
36 6PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
claudia_zurich
Member
389
1,678
Jul 2024
Zurich, CH
May 28, 2026 at 6:32 PM#5
BethLabQueen said:
Positive "side effect" of cardiovascular risk: my blood pressure dropped so much that I'm now off losartan entirely!

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.

35 5kevin_tulsa, Dr.PainCLE, mike_mealprep and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register