🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsOral GLP-1 AgonistsHas anyone dealt with rybelsus 14mg real-world experience thread?

Has anyone dealt with rybelsus 14mg real-world experience thread?

laura_annarbor Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 8:18 PM 29 replies 2,364 viewsPage 1 of 6
This thread is more than 26 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
laura_annarbor
Member
189
890
Dec 2024
Ann Arbor, MI
Mar 21, 2024 at 8:18 PM#1

Posting this because the summary going around does not say what the paper says, and the difference matters for how people here are using it.

The OASIS programme put 50mg oral in the same territory as 2.4mg injectable — around 15% mean weight loss — but it needed a dose 20 times larger to get there because almost none of the tablet is absorbed. The dose numbers are not comparable across routes and quoting them side by side confuses people.

Where I think it is weakest: the comparator does most of the work in how this gets reported, and it is not the comparator most people think they are citing.

What I am after is whether the fasting requirement is as strict in practice as the label implies, and what people actually see when they get it wrong. Not looking for reassurance. Looking for the part I have got wrong.

Note on sourcing:
Figures above are from the primary publication rather than the press summary. If a number here disagrees with one you have, post yours and we will work out which of us is reading a secondary source.
46 16labquiet_amy, emily_PDX, Dr.SleepRoch and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_nyc
VIP Member
5,678
21,345
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Mar 21, 2024 at 8:49 PM#2
laura_annarbor said:
The OASIS programme put 50mg oral in the same territory as 2.4mg injectable — around 15% mean weight loss — but it needed a dose 20 times larger to…

Agreeing with laura_annarbor, and the qualification matters more than the agreement. Oral semaglutide is absorbed in the stomach with the help of SNAC, which locally raises pH and protects the peptide long enough to cross. That mechanism is fragile: bioavailability is roughly 1% and highly sensitive to gastric contents, so a mouthful of coffee genuinely changes the exposure. This is why the label wants 30 minutes and no more than half a glass of plain water.

45 15stefan_berlin, Dr.EM_Chicago, pete_RVA and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DebRD_ATL
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Feb 2024
Atlanta, GA
Mar 21, 2024 at 9:20 PM#3
laura_annarbor said:
The OASIS programme put 50mg oral in the same territory as 2.4mg injectable — around 15% mean weight loss — but it needed a dose 20 times larger to…

I do not accept that the fasting window is a minor inconvenience. Adherence data on daily orals with timing requirements is consistently worse than weekly injections, and a drug you take imperfectly is a lower dose than the one on the box.

44 14SleepDoc_PDX, RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
andrew_nyc
Member
534
2,345
Apr 2024
New York, NY
Mar 21, 2024 at 9:51 PM#4

This one has a reasonably settled answer, so here it is. Orforglipron is the more interesting oral story because it is not a peptide at all. Being a small molecule it does not need SNAC, does not need the fasting window, and has oral bioavailability in the tens of percent rather than about one.

Last edited: Mar 22, 2024 at 2:51 AM
43 13julia.endo, JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
steve_okc
Member
489
2,123
Jul 2024
Oklahoma City, OK
Mar 22, 2024 at 12:42 AM#5
mike_nyc said:
Oral semaglutide is absorbed in the stomach with the help of SNAC, which locally raises pH and protects the peptide long enough to cross.

Agreed, and subgroup analyses deserve particular suspicion. With enough subgroups something is significant by chance, and pre-registered subgroups are a different animal from ones found afterwards.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

42 12KetoKyle, CanadaChris, ZaraB_AL and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1236

Similar Threads

Orforglipron Phase 3 ATTAIN-1 topline — oral non-peptide GLP-116 replies
Oral semaglutide 50mg (Rybelsus HD) — OASIS program results12 replies
Danuglipron BID dosing — Pfizer oral GLP-1 update7 replies
Oral vs injectable GLP-1: bioavailability and efficacy comparison5 replies
Orforglipron food interaction profile — no fasting requirement15 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register