dave_SLC said:Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
dave_SLC said:Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne thing that is still open after dave_SLC’s answer:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
josh_phd_bmore said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
I read this differently from josh_phd_bmore, on substance rather than tone. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.