One thing that is still open after PharmHunterJen’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
LindaRN_retired said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
LindaRN_retired said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
No disagreement with LindaRN_retired. One condition attached. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemLindaRN_retired said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.