One thing that is still open after james_edin’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
One thing that is still open after james_edin’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
DoseLogDan said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Pushing back on DoseLogDan here. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
DoseLogDan said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDoseLogDan said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
That reframing is the part I needed. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.