Read the primary source rather than the write-up and the two do not agree, so here is what is actually in it.
The distinction that matters is unopened versus in use. Unopened vials are stable refrigerated for their labelled shelf life and tolerate a limited excursion to room temperature. Once reconstituted, the clock is much shorter and is set by the preservative rather than by the peptide — bacteriostatic water's benzyl alcohol is what buys you multiple draws over weeks. Sterile water has no preservative and turns a multi-dose vial into a single-use one.
Where I think it is weakest: the comparator does most of the work in how this gets reported, and it is not the comparator most people think they are citing.
What I am trying to establish is what a temperature excursion actually does, and what distinguishes an unopened vial from one already in use. Not looking for reassurance. Looking for the part I have got wrong.
Note on sourcing:
Figures above are from the primary publication rather than the press summary. If a number here disagrees with one you have, post yours and we will work out which of us is reading a secondary source.