Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
hyun_seoul said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Pushing back on hyun_seoul here. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
hyun_seoul said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultshyun_seoul said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
That reframing is the part I needed. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.