jason_paloalto said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.
jason_paloalto said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
jason_paloalto said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsAdding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
pete_nash said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. Posting only so the count is not one.