stefan_berlin said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale.
stefan_berlin said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
One concrete data point for the thread. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
wendy_avl said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Pushing back on wendy_avl here. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.