The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
Late follow-up. I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
Dr.NutriCornell said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.NutriCornell said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
That is right, and it stops being right at the edges. The general case is well behaved; the interesting cases in this thread are all at the boundary where the general case breaks.
Dr.NutriCornell said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. I will report back once I have actually tried it.