Dr.SurgeonPGH said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. Posting only so the count is not one.
One concrete data point for the thread. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Following on from FDA_TrackerJim — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultslabquiet_amy said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
I read this differently from labquiet_amy, on substance rather than tone. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.