Dr.BariatricHTX said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.
wendy_avl said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale.
wendy_avl said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Coming at wendy_avl’s question from a different direction. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.
Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful. No action needed from anybody.