mike_nyc said:Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. Posting only so the count is not one.
mike_nyc said:Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. Posting only so the count is not one.
mike_nyc said:Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.
Coming at mike_nyc’s question from a different direction. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.PeteFamMed said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.