Dr.BariatricHTX said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. Posting only so the count is not one.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
DebRD_ATL said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Nothing to add that would improve it.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemDebRD_ATL said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Coming at DebRD_ATL’s question from a different direction. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.