Dr.PathRoch said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
That reframing is the part I needed. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
hyun_seoul said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Nothing to add that would improve it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardshyun_seoul said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Coming at hyun_seoul’s question from a different direction. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.