pat_auckland said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
pat_auckland said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
pam_stl said:Agreed, and the adaptation point cuts both ways: tachyphylaxis to gastric emptying is why tolerability improves, and it is also why people who were…
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Taking it to my next appointment.
pat_auckland said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Pushing back on pat_auckland here. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne concrete data point for the thread. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.