Is there a simple version of how sema vs tirz are different — anyone have experience?

SkepticalSean said:

Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…

I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.

SkepticalSean said:

Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…

True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.

SkepticalSean said:

Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…

That reframing is the part I needed. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.

Reporting back.

Closing the loop. The answer turned out to depend on the detail I had left out of the opening post, which is a lesson about how to ask rather than about the subject.

tyler_CSCS said:

The answer turned out to depend on the detail I had left out of the opening post, which is a lesson about how to ask rather than about the subject.

Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale.