bri_stats said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
bri_stats said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.PathRoch said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. Posting only so the count is not one.
Reporting back.
Update: approved on the third attempt after a peer-to-peer. Nothing about my case changed; only who was doing the talking.