🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsMetabolic Health & DiabetesGot off metformin for the first time in 8 years - crying happy tears — looking for input Page 7

Got off metformin for the first time in 8 years - crying happy tears — looking for input

ricardo_MIA Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 9:41 PM 39 replies 1,834 viewsPage 7 of 8
quinn_sf
Member
489
2,123
Jun 2024
San Francisco, CA
Feb 6, 2025 at 1:11 PM#31
ricardo_MIA said:
Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.

Mine went the same way, slower.

Last edited: Feb 6, 2025 at 7:11 PM
1 24tane_welly
Reply Quote Save Share Report
kate.chem
VIP Member
3,890
17,654
Dec 2023
California
Feb 6, 2025 at 8:39 PM#32
ricardo_MIA said:
Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.

2 0VanRx_Mike, steve_okc
Reply Quote Save Share Report
stefan_berlin
Member
234
1,123
Oct 2024
Berlin, DE
Feb 7, 2025 at 4:07 AM#33

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.

3 1KevinCompounds, TirzTom, TrialTracker_MD
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
AttorneyGrant
Member
567
2,890
Apr 2024
Washington, DC
Feb 7, 2025 at 11:35 AM#34

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?

Last edited: Feb 7, 2025 at 12:35 PM
4 2pat_auckland, Dr.GastroMayo, JakeBK_lifts and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
VanRx_Mike
Member
678
2,890
May 2024
Vancouver, CA
Feb 7, 2025 at 7:02 PM#35
stefan_berlin said:
Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.

5 3mike_mod, SarahChen_PharmD, sarah.morrison and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SUSTAIN-6 to SELECT — the cardiovascular evidence timeline14 replies
GLP-1 and insulin resistance — HOMA-IR improvement data17 replies
Metabolic syndrome reversal criteria — how GLP-1 addresses all 55 replies
A1C target achievement rates — sema vs tirz comparison8 replies
SURPASS-CVOT: tirzepatide cardiovascular outcomes trial design3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register