🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsBuyer BewareHas anyone dealt with ⚠ facebook marketplace glp-1? Page 9

Has anyone dealt with ⚠ facebook marketplace glp-1?

ben_calgary Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 10:19 PM 56 replies 3,406 viewsPage 9 of 12
Dr.RheumBOS
Member
567
2,345
Apr 2024
Boston, MA
Mar 29, 2024 at 4:01 PM#41
PeptideChemSF said:
Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the…

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

25 23pam_stl, wei_SG, cory_ATX and 22 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DataDave
Senior Member
1,678
8,901
Apr 2024
Washington
Online
Mar 31, 2024 at 6:54 PM#42

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

Last edited: Mar 31, 2024 at 7:54 PM
26 24mike_nyc, VendorMark, COA_Karl and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Apr 2, 2024 at 9:46 PM#43

Moderator note: a couple of off-topic posts removed. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.

27 0RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ and 24 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
zoe_NC
Member
278
1,234
Nov 2024
Charlotte, NC
Apr 5, 2024 at 12:37 AM#44
DataDave said:
For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.

Last edited: Apr 5, 2024 at 1:37 AM
28 1NicoleRaleigh, james_edin, FranDenver and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
NicoleRaleigh
Member
356
1,567
Aug 2024
Raleigh, NC
Apr 7, 2024 at 3:27 AM#45
DataDave said:
For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

That holds where the measurement is reliable. Where it is noisy — and a lot of what gets tracked here is noisy — the same reasoning produces confident nonsense.

Last edited: Apr 7, 2024 at 4:27 AM
29 2mike_nyc, VendorMark, COA_Karl and 26 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

⚠ Peptide Sciences SHUT DOWN March 6, 2026 — what happened and what to do now8 replies
⚠ Amino Asylum raided by FDA June 2025 — warehouse seized6 replies
⚠ Swiss Chems FDA warning letter December 2024 — selling unapproved drugs6 replies
⚠ 50+ FDA warning letters sent to peptide vendors in 2025 — full list4 replies
⚠ PeptideMeter exposed: some vendors scoring E grade on basic peptides4 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register