Admin said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
Admin said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemFollowing on from Admin — and this may be the naive question:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
Dr.PeteFamMed said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
I read this differently from Dr.PeteFamMed, on substance rather than tone. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.