LindaRN_retired said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
LindaRN_retired said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from LindaRN_retired — and this may be the naive question:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
PharmacoVig_BOS said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.