anna.melb_AU said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
claudia_zurich said:Right, and one flattering data point from a group buy is not consistency.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes.
anna.melb_AU said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Pushing back on anna.melb_AU here. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne concrete data point for the thread. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.
Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.