sophie_paris said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Second this.
sophie_paris said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Second this.
sophie_paris said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
oliver_london said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Pushing back on oliver_london here. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.